|
|
Reflections
on what to expect during the course of a typical SDN workshop, to provide
some preparatory information for those intending to attend their first
workshop.
1. How Karla Meyer sees a workshop*
- During the first day, people
tend to arrive at different times. They get organized in their rooms
and then have time to talk to other participants or go for a walk. After
the evening meal, everyone meets to discuss the agenda for the coming
days. Each person introduces themselves briefly, and can then outline
their particular project/s for the workshop. Such projects can be a
sharing of SD issues the person is particularly interested in, of either
personal or public concern, and on which they can ask for specific feedback
or for the help of the other SDN members. Or the project can be an offer
to the group of some group activity.
- Participants are encouraged
to nominate and have their own session on any matter they feel is relevant
to the group, or important to themselves personally. What one may tend
to see as 'only a personal issue' is always of group relevance within
the wholeness that is real community. However there is no obligation.
- Timeslots are allocated
to these projects, which are recorded on large sheets of butcher's paper.
Some timeslots are reserved for bushwalks or other leisure activities,
and each January one is allocated for the SDN Annual General Meeting,
usually towards the end of the week. Sessions start daily around 9 am,
and the last (evening) sessions end around 10 to 10.30 pm. Depending
on the venue, meal preparations are shared by all, or catering is supplied.
The last evening is devoted to a party. In January, those interested
may want to stay on for an extra day of discussions about the Nurturing
Evolutionary Development (N.E.D.) Foundation, Ned's will project.
Back
to Top
2.
Michael Maher's thoughts*
- Constructive and active
participation in workshop sessions is part of the SDN ethos. We believe
that the presence and input of every participant can make a difference,
and therefore that we attend the workshop as much to offer as to receive.
- Participants are encouraged
to speak up at the time instead of 'sitting on their feelings'. An atmosphere
of respect for individual views and feelings creates a supportive environment
for voicing our thoughts, (no matter that these haven't been properly
formulated in our mind first).
- Punctuality has become a
behaviour trait highly admired during workshops, though not always achieved.
We will aim to begin whether you've arrived or not.
- Differing personal attitudes
and approaches to situations are always respected and accommodated for,
especially wherever the effectiveness of group processes is not thereby
jeopardized.
- Sessions have the potential
to press emotional or belief 'buttons' among participants, and when
this happens the personal crises evoked are always given priority and
sensitive attention. Private assistance to help resolve or share these
issues can be freely requested from more experienced members.
- It is not mandatory to attend
all sessions; however participation is encouraged so that as many approaches
to any topic as possible can be considered. It would be appreciated
if your intention to be absent were communicated to someone before the
session, so that no time is spent waiting, and we can proceed knowing
you are OK.
- If there is any particular
session you feel uncomfortable about, you are under no obligation to
attend, so long as we know.
- We also value the skills
of listening and noticing : all participants are asked to notice when
others are having difficulty finding the space to speak, especially
during the more high energy discussions, and then to actively invite
them to offer their input.
- For issues that are felt
to be too personal, or too specific to another person for them to be
aired within a group session, there is always space provided for unstructured
one-to-one interaction, during which you can seek out those with whom
you would like to talk with more privacy.
- Cooking, washing up, planning
and house-cleaning tasks are shared by all throughout the workshop.
We aim to keep costs to a minimum, and nobody is paid. These shared
activities help us open ourselves to experiencing the full mutuality
that is community.
- Unstructured time is always
provided, during which there are usually group excursions on offer,
to visit some of the interesting natural attractions in the area of
the workshop venue. Such events often provide for some of the most memorable
interactions - there's nothing like a good open air walk to get to know
the inner feelings of our companions!
- Sessions usually take the
following format: approx 1.5 hrs long, 2 of them in the morning, 2 in
the afternoon, and 1 after dinner in the evening - all depending on
their expected length. Shorter sessions are also allowed for. As we
say, 'The Agenda is the participants' issues'.
Freedom
of spirit, takes courage and faith. "Start by doing what's necessary,
then what's possible, and suddenly you are doing the impossible." (St.
Francis of Assisi, quoted by Deanna Forster)
*
(Ideas from Karla Meyer & Michael Maher, edited and consolidated by Ned
Iceton.)
Back
to Top
3.
Check list formula for preparing a Case Study on your issue
(An
option for taking your and our thinking further than is otherwise likely.
Think yourself through in advance. If you write it up and send to Ned,
it can be run off and supplied to the group as background. Otherwise it
is background thinking to help you present what you want to discuss.)
- Begin with a 40-word description
of yourself and what you are aiming generally to do in your life.
-
- Your case study
should set out (a) the practical facts, questions and issues and
actions you've taken that describe the situation; (b) the
understandings and guesses you have about the situation you
are dealing with, and (c) how you believe the dynamics may
be altered by your intervention to produce the particular outcome(s)
that you hope for, over what period of time.
- Your case study may
be: (a) a completed one, and seen as either successful or unsuccessful;
or (b) partially so; or it may be (c) work in progress; or it may
be (d) a series of mini-cases that outline a recurring type of problem;
or it may simply set out (e) the problem situation facing you at
present.
- Each case will ideally
balance theory and practice, showing how each informs and influences
the other in a circular feedback reflection-and-action process.
About half the case should be factually descriptive and the other
half should outline your thinking (theory) about it and about the
action you are taking.
- The description
should cover an overview of the situation you are tackling and then
a description of what you as practitioner did or are doing, and
why.
- The
theory part
should outline what your hunches and assumptions were in
tackling the situation as you did. This may include your prior assumptions
about particular people, about social systems or organisations,
or about the effects of particular kinds of intervention. The theory
section should then describe the actual outcome, your conclusions
as to why this outcome was as it was, the lessons you've
drawn so far, and what you would do differently next time. It should
finish with the questions that the experience has raised
for you, including those you have no immediate answers for.
Back
to Top |